Please identify if a formula in "Mail" is possible after looking at a sorted address and checking for unique Lname, highest sales and latest date. Or, do I just use a de-dupe utility ? Thanks - H.
Logic: record 1 & 2 duplicate - same last name and address =
Take record 2 becasue the sales are higher and date sold is most current.
Perform this chjecking for each and next record. Results would be to mail "M" the 3 records in a mail-merge letter.
BEFORE
Lname Address Type Sales Date Sold Mail
1SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 260,485 3/20/2000
2SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 360,000 3/9/2005
3WODZISZ 0N422 SULLEY PL 0 80,000 7/9/2001
4WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 21,721 8/3/1999
5WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 32,081 8/8/2000
AFTER
1SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 260,485 3/20/2000 D
2SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 360,000 3/9/2005 M
3WODZISZ 0N422 SULLEY PL 0 80,000 7/9/2001 M
4WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 21,721 8/3/1999 M
5WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 32,081 8/8/2000 D
Logic: record 1 & 2 duplicate - same last name and address =
Take record 2 becasue the sales are higher and date sold is most current.
Perform this chjecking for each and next record. Results would be to mail "M" the 3 records in a mail-merge letter.
BEFORE
Lname Address Type Sales Date Sold Mail
1SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 260,485 3/20/2000
2SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 360,000 3/9/2005
3WODZISZ 0N422 SULLEY PL 0 80,000 7/9/2001
4WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 21,721 8/3/1999
5WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 32,081 8/8/2000
AFTER
1SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 260,485 3/20/2000 D
2SORGATZ 0N417 ARMSTRONG LN 0 360,000 3/9/2005 M
3WODZISZ 0N422 SULLEY PL 0 80,000 7/9/2001 M
4WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 21,721 8/3/1999 M
5WILSON 0N425 SULLEY PL 0 32,081 8/8/2000 D