Hello Excel Experts.
Please feel free to ask me questions about my sample investment spreadsheet. I'm not sure how much of it I need to explain to get my question(s) answered. The basic idea is the "Projection" tab summarizes the potential investments based on the top table, where you plot different letters (P=purchase,R=rent,S=sale) along the timeline to indicate when investments are made (ie. Purchase "P03" in 2017). On the "List" tab, I have all the potential investments. This is where the Projection tab pulls data from to calculate different things, like cash flow and equity.
Problem 1: As long as List and Projection have the same number of property rows, this sheet works fine. Since the sumproducts can't work with different ranges, everything gets screwed up if I add another property in the List tab. Can I keep the functionality of the spreadsheet, but add properties to the list? In other words, can the formulas check the projected list of investments against a larger/dynamic range of properties on the List tab? We can assume that the identifiers (ID, column A) are unique.
Let's use the "Net (Cash)" row as an example.
Current formula: =SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="S")*List!$AC$3:$AC$9)+SUMPRODUCT(((C$2:C$8="R")+(C$2:C$8="P"))*List!$U$3:$U$9)*12-SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="P")*List!$H$3:$H$9)
Problem occurs when I add a few rows on the List tab: =SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="S")*List!$AC$3:$AC$12)+SUMPRODUCT(((C$2:C$8="R")+(C$2:C$8="P"))*List!$U$3:$U$12)*12-SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="P")*List!$H$3:$H$12)
The question is, can I still do what this formula is doing, but have the ability to add rows on the List tab?
Problem 2: This isn't really a problem, but I'm curious if there's a more efficient way to calculate the "asset" and "liability" lines on the Projected tab. Currently, I have 2 separate tables (rows 10-35) running calculations of assets while accounting for appreciation, and liabilities while accounting for paying it down over time. Is there a way to fit all the calculations in the Asset and Liability rows, eliminating the need for the 2 above tables?
Thanks in advance!
<tbody>
</tbody>
<tbody>
</tbody>
<tbody>
</tbody>
<tbody>
</tbody>
Please feel free to ask me questions about my sample investment spreadsheet. I'm not sure how much of it I need to explain to get my question(s) answered. The basic idea is the "Projection" tab summarizes the potential investments based on the top table, where you plot different letters (P=purchase,R=rent,S=sale) along the timeline to indicate when investments are made (ie. Purchase "P03" in 2017). On the "List" tab, I have all the potential investments. This is where the Projection tab pulls data from to calculate different things, like cash flow and equity.
Problem 1: As long as List and Projection have the same number of property rows, this sheet works fine. Since the sumproducts can't work with different ranges, everything gets screwed up if I add another property in the List tab. Can I keep the functionality of the spreadsheet, but add properties to the list? In other words, can the formulas check the projected list of investments against a larger/dynamic range of properties on the List tab? We can assume that the identifiers (ID, column A) are unique.
Let's use the "Net (Cash)" row as an example.
Current formula: =SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="S")*List!$AC$3:$AC$9)+SUMPRODUCT(((C$2:C$8="R")+(C$2:C$8="P"))*List!$U$3:$U$9)*12-SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="P")*List!$H$3:$H$9)
Problem occurs when I add a few rows on the List tab: =SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="S")*List!$AC$3:$AC$12)+SUMPRODUCT(((C$2:C$8="R")+(C$2:C$8="P"))*List!$U$3:$U$12)*12-SUMPRODUCT((C$2:C$8="P")*List!$H$3:$H$12)
The question is, can I still do what this formula is doing, but have the ability to add rows on the List tab?
Problem 2: This isn't really a problem, but I'm curious if there's a more efficient way to calculate the "asset" and "liability" lines on the Projected tab. Currently, I have 2 separate tables (rows 10-35) running calculations of assets while accounting for appreciation, and liabilities while accounting for paying it down over time. Is there a way to fit all the calculations in the Asset and Liability rows, eliminating the need for the 2 above tables?
Thanks in advance!
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DP | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
2 | P01 | 50,000 | P | R | R | R | R | R | S | ||
3 | P02 | 60,000 | P | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |
4 | P03 | 50,000 | P | R | R | R | R | R | R | ||
5 | P04 | 75,000 | P | R | R | R | R | R | |||
6 | P05 | 30,000 | P | R | R | R | R | ||||
7 | P06 | 65,000 | P | R | R | R | |||||
8 | P07 | 120,000 | P | R | R | ||||||
9 | |||||||||||
10 | Asset | ||||||||||
11 | P01 | 245,000 | 252,452 | 260,130 | 268,043 | 276,195 | 284,596 | ||||
12 | P02 | 147,000 | 151,471 | 156,078 | 160,826 | 165,717 | 170,758 | 175,951 | 181,303 | ||
13 | P03 | 269,500 | 277,697 | 286,144 | 294,847 | 303,815 | 313,056 | 322,578 | |||
14 | P04 | 343,000 | 353,433 | 364,183 | 375,260 | 386,674 | 398,435 | ||||
15 | P05 | 122,500 | 126,226 | 130,065 | 134,021 | 138,098 | |||||
16 | P06 | 283,220 | 291,834 | 300,711 | 309,857 | ||||||
17 | P07 | 441,000 | 454,413 | 468,235 | |||||||
18 | Loan | ||||||||||
19 | P01 | 195,000 | 190,629 | 186,057 | 181,276 | 176,274 | 171,043 | ||||
20 | P02 | 87,000 | 84,371 | 81,622 | 78,746 | 75,739 | 72,593 | 69,302 | 65,861 | ||
21 | P03 | 219,500 | 214,734 | 209,749 | 204,535 | 199,081 | 193,377 | 187,411 | |||
22 | P04 | 268,000 | 262,451 | 256,648 | 250,578 | 244,229 | 237,589 | ||||
23 | P05 | 92,500 | 89,783 | 86,941 | 83,968 | 80,859 | |||||
24 | P06 | 218,220 | 213,773 | 209,098 | 204,183 | ||||||
25 | P07 | 321,000 | 315,036 | 308,767 | |||||||
26 | |||||||||||
27 | |||||||||||
28 | Net (Cash) | -55,184 | -57,825 | -47,826 | -70,567 | -17,973 | -54,323 | 17,852 | 20,681 | 20,681 | |
29 | Net (Equity) | -55,184 | -57,825 | -47,826 | -70,567 | -17,973 | -54,323 | 38,739 | 20,681 | 20,681 | |
30 | Flow/Yr | 2,166 | 6,585 | 10,259 | 14,723 | 15,702 | 19,173 | 20,681 | 20,681 | 20,681 | |
31 | Flow/Yr (g) | 19,500 | 32,700 | 57,900 | 84,900 | 94,500 | 117,900 | 130,200 | 130,200 | 130,200 | |
32 | Asset | 245,000 | 399,452 | 681,102 | 1,044,818 | 1,199,097 | 1,518,789 | 1,712,732 | 1,764,826 | 1,818,505 | |
33 | Liability | 195,000 | 277,629 | 489,929 | 745,632 | 819,721 | 1,015,968 | 1,143,965 | 1,115,010 | 1,084,670 | |
34 | Equity | 50,000 | 121,823 | 191,173 | 299,186 | 379,376 | 502,821 | 568,767 | 649,816 | 733,835 | |
35 | Reserve | 3,644 | 5,275 | 9,852 | 14,646 | 16,310 | 20,524 | 22,976 | 22,976 | 22,976 | |
36 | Operating $ | 350,000 | 291,172 | 231,716 | 179,312 | 103,951 | 84,315 | 25,777 | 41,177 | 61,858 | 82,539 |
37 | Net Worth | 53,644 | 127,098 | 201,025 | 313,832 | 395,685 | 523,345 | 591,742 | 672,792 | 756,811 |
<tbody>
</tbody>
Projection
Worksheet Formulas
<tbody> </tbody> |
<tbody>
</tbody>
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | AA | AB | AC | AD | AE | AF | AG | AH | AI | AJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | List | Purchase | 98% | 103% | P03 | Rent | 8% | 0% | 1% | Sale | 7% | 5% | Analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ID | Address | List Price | Buy Price | Sale Total | $ on Hand | Rsv | Cash Inv | DP | Loan | APR | Income | Mort | xPmt | PM | Ins | HOA | Tx (Yr) | Msc | Exp (mo) | Cash Flow | Price | AR | Repairs | Recap-25% | Cap Gain | 1031 | Tax | Net | Cap | R:BP (1%) | $:$ | DTI | Return (GRM) | Return (Net) | Payoff |
3 | P01 | 132 Oak Street | 250,000 | 245,000 | 252,350 | 50,000 | 2429 | 57,350 | 20% | 195,000 | 4.5% | 1,625 | 988 | 100 | 130 | 37 | 55 | 1,617 | 0 | 1,445 | 180 | 319,669 | 3.0% | 7,016 | 80,356 | 151,288 | 20,887 | 130,402 | 6.2% | 0.66% | 4% | 89% | 12.6 yrs | 17.1 yrs | 24.9 yrs | |
4 | P02 | 555 Maple Ln | 150,000 | 147,000 | 151,410 | 60,000 | 1087 | 64,410 | 41% | 87,000 | 4.5% | 1,100 | 441 | 100 | 88 | 22 | - | 970 | 0 | 732 | 368 | 197,556 | 3.0% | 5,000 | 4,811 | 50,970 | 130,157 | 13,393 | 116,764 | 7.4% | 0.75% | 7% | 67% | 11.2 yrs | 11.5 yrs | 20.6 yrs |
5 | P03 | 1st Ave #12 | 275,000 | 269,500 | 277,585 | 50,000 | 3052 | 58,085 | 19% | 219,500 | 4.5% | 2,100 | 1,112 | 100 | 168 | 40 | 225 | 1,779 | 0 | 1,794 | 306 | 351,636 | 3.0% | 7,718 | 88,392 | 160,963 | 22,975 | 137,988 | 6.8% | 0.78% | 6% | 85% | 10.7 yrs | 12 yrs | 25.4 yrs | |
6 | P04 | 1200 Cedar Road | 350,000 | 343,000 | 353,290 | 75,000 | 3196 | 85,290 | 22% | 268,000 | 4.5% | 2,250 | 1,358 | 100 | 180 | 51 | - | 2,264 | 0 | 1,878 | 372 | 434,502 | 3.0% | 8,419 | 94,763 | 190,480 | 24,689 | 165,790 | 6.4% | 0.66% | 5% | 83% | 12.8 yrs | 15.1 yrs | 26.1 yrs | |
7 | P05 | 920 Brook Ave | 125,000 | 122,500 | 126,175 | 30,000 | 1109 | 33,675 | 24% | 92,500 | 4.5% | 800 | 469 | 100 | 64 | 18 | - | 809 | 0 | 718 | 82 | 150,660 | 3.0% | 600 | 2,506 | 27,036 | 70,219 | 7,085 | 63,134 | 6.4% | 0.65% | 3% | 90% | 12.8 yrs | 15.5 yrs | 21 yrs |
8 | P06 | 72 E Hillsdale Street | 289,000 | 283,220 | 291,717 | 65,000 | 2809 | 73,497 | 23% | 218,220 | 5.0% | 1,950 | 1,171 | 100 | 156 | 42 | 35 | 1,869 | 0 | 1,661 | 289 | 338,179 | 3.0% | 4,635 | 49,825 | 128,317 | 13,064 | 115,253 | 6.6% | 0.69% | 5% | 85% | 12.2 yrs | 15.8 yrs | 25.2 yrs | |
9 | P07 | 4350 Green Ridge | 450,000 | 441,000 | 454,230 | 120,000 | 4064 | 133,230 | 27% | 321,000 | 5.0% | 2,650 | 1,723 | 100 | 212 | 66 | - | 2,911 | 0 | 2,344 | 306 | 511,240 | 3.0% | 3,000 | 5,412 | 53,102 | 190,040 | 14,113 | 175,927 | 5.8% | 0.60% | 3% | 88% | 13.9 yrs | 27.4 yrs | 26.6 yrs |
10 | P08 | 1014 Canyon Drive | 150,000 | 147,000 | 151,410 | 50,000 | 1357 | 54,410 | 34% | 97,000 | 5.0% | 950 | 521 | 100 | 76 | 22 | 55 | 970 | 0 | 855 | 95 | 151,410 | 3.0% | 601 | 0 | 47,227 | 0 | 47,227 | 5.8% | 0.65% | 2% | 90% | 12.9 yrs | 23.3 yrs | 21.2 yrs | |
11 | P09 | 88 Thorton Ln | 415,000 | 406,700 | 418,901 | 50,000 | 4399 | 62,201 | 12% | 356,700 | 5.0% | 2,550 | 1,915 | 100 | 204 | 61 | - | 2,684 | 0 | 2,504 | 46 | 418,901 | 3.0% | 1,200 | 1,664 | 0 | 41,463 | 0 | 41,463 | 6.1% | 0.63% | 1% | 98% | 13.3 yrs | 35.4 yrs | 26.9 yrs |
12 | P10 | 41-829 Broadway Blvd | 365,000 | 357,700 | 368,431 | 50,000 | 3904 | 60,731 | 14% | 307,700 | 5.0% | 2,350 | 1,652 | 100 | 188 | 54 | 50 | 2,361 | 0 | 2,240 | 110 | 368,431 | 3.0% | 1,463 | 0 | 42,551 | 0 | 42,551 | 6.2% | 0.66% | 2% | 95% | 12.7 yrs | 24.2 yrs | 26.4 yrs | |
13 | P11 | 1550 Lone Way | 180,000 | 176,400 | 181,692 | 50,000 | 1954 | 55,292 | 28% | 126,400 | 5.0% | 1,750 | 679 | 100 | 140 | 26 | 175 | 1,164 | 0 | 1,217 | 533 | 181,692 | 3.0% | 722 | 0 | 46,575 | 0 | 46,575 | 8.9% | 0.99% | 12% | 70% | 8.4 yrs | 7.3 yrs | 22.7 yrs | |
14 | P12 | 560 Tumbleweed St | 325,000 | 318,500 | 328,055 | 50,000 | 3675 | 59,555 | 16% | 268,500 | 5.5% | 2,100 | 1,525 | 100 | 168 | 48 | 90 | 2,102 | 0 | 2,105 | -5 | 328,055 | 3.0% | 6,500 | 1,303 | 0 | 43,079 | 0 | 43,079 | 6.1% | 0.66% | 0% | 100% | 12.7 yrs | 52.5 yrs | 25.9 yrs |
<tbody>
</tbody>
List
Worksheet Formulas
<tbody> </tbody> |
<tbody>
</tbody>