HOW DO I DISPLAY A LABEL (E.G. A OR E below) AND SHOW UNIQUE LABEL(s) FOR EACH LOCATION (WITHOUT REPEATING LABELS UNNECESSARILY)? FOR EXAMPLE SHOW LABEL A IN DALLAS, A IN NEW YORK, and A IN MIAMI (in Table 3, last table below). ALSO SHOW ON THE LIST LABEL E FOR DALLAS, NEW YORK AND MIAMI AND MIAMI, IF A LABEL IS NOT ONLY AT A SINGLE LOCATION, SHOW THAT LABEL IN THE TABLE ABOVE AND LOCATION IN COLUMN R, LASTLY ADD THE CONTENT IN COLUMN S
Raw data (column A to H), Note Location is Column B (Table1)
DATA FROM COLUMN L TO 0 (THIS WORKS PERFECTLY) (Table2)
DATA FROM COLUMN Q TO U BELOW: THIS IS THE TABLE I NEED HELP POPULATION (WANT TO KNOW BEST FORMULA FOR LABEL COLUMN AND LOCATION COLUMN (Table3)
Raw data (column A to H), Note Location is Column B (Table1)
Location | Code | Name | Quantity | Label | Wt (lbs) | Rank | ||
Dallas | DER11 | Tester1 | 5,000 | A | 2,673.75 | 1 | ||
Dallas | DER11 | Tester1 | 400 | E | 1190.67 | 2 | ||
Dallas | DER11 | Tester1 | 60 | F | 305.52 | 3 | ||
Dallas | DER11 | Tester1 | 7,000 | H | 0.25 | 4 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 50 | E | 117.48 | 5 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 49 | F | 14.47 | 6 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 43 | A | 12453.96 | 7 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 8,700 | E | 4245.62 | 8 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 2,100 | F | 1633.13 | 9 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 31 | F | 99.90 | 10 | ||
Dallas | FAE33 | Practice2 | 43 | H | 0.85 | 11 | ||
New York | DER11 | Tester1 | 4 | A | 12506.52 | 12 | ||
New York | DER11 | Tester1 | 76 | E | 5571.72 | 13 | ||
New York | DER11 | Tester1 | 90 | F | 1633.07 | 14 | ||
New York | FAE33 | Practice2 | 633 | F | 748.98 | 15 | ||
New York | FAE33 | Practice2 | 34 | H | 0.40 | 16 | ||
New York | FAE33 | Practice2 | 42 | A | 239.93 | 17 | ||
New York | FAE33 | Practice2 | 23 | E | 383.96 | 18 | ||
Miami | DER11 | Tester1 | 444 | F | 150.87 | 19 | ||
Miami | DER11 | Tester1 | 746 | H | 0.64 | 20 | ||
Miami | FAE33 | Practice2 | 544 | A | 19.67 | 21 | ||
Miami | FAE33 | Practice2 | 23 | C | 0.87 | 22 | ||
Miami | FAE33 | Practice2 | 10 | E | 167.37 | 23 | ||
DATA FROM COLUMN L TO 0 (THIS WORKS PERFECTLY) (Table2)
Unique Location | Cum Quantity | Cum Wts | % of Wts |
New York | 902 | 21,084.59 | 49.6% |
Dallas | 23,476 | 22,735.61 | 51.5% |
Miami | 1,767 | 339.42 | 0.8% |
DATA FROM COLUMN Q TO U BELOW: THIS IS THE TABLE I NEED HELP POPULATION (WANT TO KNOW BEST FORMULA FOR LABEL COLUMN AND LOCATION COLUMN (Table3)
Label | Location | Cum Quantity | Cum Wts | % of Wts |
A | ||||
E | ||||
H | ||||
F | ||||
C | ||||