Date cash flows interest rate
1/31/2016 -10,000 9.00%
2/29/2016 574
3/31/2016 864
4/30/2016 1,246
5/31/2016 2,748
6/30/2016 3,367
7/31/2016 2,437
8/31/2016 2,276
9/30/2016 1,839
10/31/2016 1,264
11/30/2016 623
Using Excel's NPV function = 817(and subtracting out the initial investment 10k, manually)
but using XNPV i get = 6,561
Obviously, there is a huge discrepancy. I understand that you can include the initial payment of time =0 when using XNPV and this is what I did. Not sure why I am getting such a high number for XNPV. I believe that XNPV converts the 9% annual rate to a daily rate automatically but I dont think that explains the difference. XNPV is designed to use dates and include the initial payment.
thank you
1/31/2016 -10,000 9.00%
2/29/2016 574
3/31/2016 864
4/30/2016 1,246
5/31/2016 2,748
6/30/2016 3,367
7/31/2016 2,437
8/31/2016 2,276
9/30/2016 1,839
10/31/2016 1,264
11/30/2016 623
Using Excel's NPV function = 817(and subtracting out the initial investment 10k, manually)
but using XNPV i get = 6,561
Obviously, there is a huge discrepancy. I understand that you can include the initial payment of time =0 when using XNPV and this is what I did. Not sure why I am getting such a high number for XNPV. I believe that XNPV converts the 9% annual rate to a daily rate automatically but I dont think that explains the difference. XNPV is designed to use dates and include the initial payment.
thank you