Ok, wait. Actually I'm not as dumb as I thought. Using what was described does not work. Let's say you have a range of ten numbers. 2 of them are negative, 3 of them are 0. If you use the formula by NBVC, it will not show a ranking for the ones that are less than or equal to zero. But it will still rank out of all ten numbers. I need it to realize there are only 5 numbers it should be using for ranking purposes, therefore giving ranking numbers of 1 thru 5. Using NBVCs formula, it will just not see rankings 1 thru 5, and it will start with number 6, assuming I am doing an asscending rank order which I am.