How do you mean the top 1/3? I can think of at least 4 ways to figure that. If the maximum value is 3.0, then the 3 ranges would be 0-1 for 1.5%, 1-2 for 2% and 2-3 for 2.5%, which is not what your example shows. Or if there is a theoretical maximum of 4, even if no one gets it, the ranges would be 0-1.33, 1.33 to 2.67, 2.67 to 4, which actually matches your example. Or you could figure the max value minus the min value and divide into ranges, or 3.0-.6 = 2.4. 2.4/3 = .8, so the ranges would be .6-1.4, 1.4 to 2.2, 2.2 to 3.0. Or we could say that we have n total scores, and anything below the n/3 lowest score gets 1.5%, anything over the n/3 highest score gets 2.5%, everyone else gets 2%.