Remove blank rows for large data set

artz

Well-known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Messages
830
Office Version
  1. 2016
Platform
  1. Windows
Hi,

I've got a data worksheet with over 1 million rows. I need to remove blank rows so that I can chart the data. The following code worked fine for worksheets with tens of thousands of rows but Excel stops responding when the data set goes into the hundreds of thousands of rows:
Code:
Sub DeleteRowIfCellBlank()
    On Error Resume Next
 
    Columns("A").SpecialCells(xlCellTypeBlanks).EntireRow.Delete
End Sub

Can anyone in the Forum provide code that will work well with with a large data set? Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Art
 
All,

Many thanks to all who helped. Several great solutions making working with these huge files a piece of cake. :)

Art
 
Upvote 0

Excel Facts

Copy formula down without changing references
If you have =SUM(F2:F49) in F50; type Alt+' in F51 to copy =SUM(F2:F49) to F51, leaving the formula in edit mode. Change SUM to COUNT.
All,

Many thanks to all who helped. Several great solutions making working with these huge files a piece of cake. :)

Art
You're welcome. :)

I assume that you have realised that the options that only sort do not actually remove the rows that are blank in the relevant column so data in those rows but in other columns would remain on your worksheet - though at the bottom.
 
Upvote 0
Yup. but it's all good, thanks. Got me where I need to go and get done. :) I just wonder why Excel stumbles with large arrays. Twenty years ago, I worked on arrays of data 10x this size on much less competent hardware using Matlab. That program never blinked. I think that MS should get XL up to speed for the scientific community. My two cents, and thanks again. Art.
 
Upvote 0
Yup. but it's all good, thanks. Got me where I need to go and get done. :)
Not sure which code you ended up using & noting that speed seems to be something of an issue for you, the code that I posted that does actually remove the 'blank rows' & doesn't leave an extra column of numbers to the right so gives a 'tidier' result & to boot is about 20% faster than the code that doesn't remove the row. If you don't mind the spare data at the bottom, my code would be a tiny bit faster again if you removed the .Resize(k).EntireRow.Delete line near the end.

In the end though, which code you use is up to you & the main thing is you got the result you wanted. :)


I just wonder why Excel stumbles with large arrays. Twenty years ago, I worked on arrays of data 10x this size on much less competent hardware using Matlab. That program never blinked. I think that MS should get XL up to speed for the scientific community. My two cents, and thanks again. Art.
Have you investigated Power BI? If not, the 3 'Stickys' at the top of the Power BI Forum might be a place to start.
 
Upvote 0

Forum statistics

Threads
1,214,396
Messages
6,119,268
Members
448,881
Latest member
Faxgirl

We've detected that you are using an adblocker.

We have a great community of people providing Excel help here, but the hosting costs are enormous. You can help keep this site running by allowing ads on MrExcel.com.
Allow Ads at MrExcel

Which adblocker are you using?

Disable AdBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Pause on this site" option.
Go back

Disable AdBlock Plus

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock Plus

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the toggle to disable it for "mrexcel.com".
Go back

Disable uBlock Origin

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock Origin

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back

Disable uBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back
Back
Top