excel magic trick 778, example 6

[tpuck2687]

Excel Magic Trick 778: INDEX & MATCH Lookup Functions Beginning To Advanced (18 Examples) - YouTube example 6. I have a table similar to this one without the descending numbers as "pipe size". My "pipe sizes" would have to be 0-2, 2.1-4, 4.1-6, 6.1-8, and >8.1. My rainfall would also have to be ranges 0-1000, 1000-2000, 2000-
3000, 3000-4000, and 4000-5000. The corresponding table values are......

	1000	2000	3000	4000	5000
2	10	7	5	4	1
4	7	5	4	3	1
6	5	4	3	2	1
8	4	3	2	2	1
100	1	1	1	1	1

<colgroup><col width="73" style="width: 55pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 2669;" span="6"> <tbody> </tbody>

What value do I need to put in the 100 spot to show anything greater than 8?
if c51=5 and c52=2650 I would need c53=3 and I'm currently getting 5 with...
=INDEX(Sheet2!$G$5:$K$9,MATCH(Schaurer!C51,Sheet2!$F$5:$F$9,1),MATCH(Schaurer!C52,Sheet2!$G$4:$K$4,1))

 

[tpuck2687]

is there a way to do it to keep my current table?

Column1	Column2	Column3	Column4	Column5	Column6
	0to1000	1000to2000	2000to3000	3000to4000	4000to∞
0to2	10	7	5	4	1
2.1to4	7	5	4	3	1
4.1to6	5	4	3	2	1
6.1to8	4	3	2	2	1
8.1to∞	1	1	1	1	1

<colgroup><col width="73" style="width: 55pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 2669;" span="6"> <tbody> </tbody>

 

[Aladin Akyurek]

that seems to be working for the first column numbers 2,4,6 and 8 now I would need the first row to do the same with 1000,2000,3000 and 4000

1169 must be treated as what using the row C2:G2?

 

[tpuck2687]

1169 must be treated as what using the row C2:G2?

I'm not sure that I understand what your question is.

 

[Aladin Akyurek]

I'm not sure that I understand what your question is.

Why not? It's a question similar to the 8 case. So, is 1169 1000 or 2000?

 

[tpuck2687]

I see....... 1169 would fall between 1000 and 2000 but if I had 1000 it would need to fall between 0-1000 and if I had 2000 it would need to fall between 1000-2000. Im just having trouble getting numbers that fall EXACTLY as on of my ranges, ie 2,4,6 or 1000,2000, 3000, to fall in the right range. The last equation seemed to fix the numbers that fell on the row headers, now I need it to work for the column headers

 

[Aladin Akyurek]

I see....... 1169 would fall between 1000 and 2000 but if I had 1000 it would need to fall between 0-1000 and if I had 2000 it would need to fall between 1000-2000. Im just having trouble getting numbers that fall EXACTLY as on of my ranges, ie 2,4,6 or 1000,2000, 3000, to fall in the right range. The last equation seemed to fix the numbers that fell on the row headers, now I need it to work for the column headers

Your answer should be either 1000 or 2000, not between..

 

[tpuck2687]

It needs to be in the second column range, 1000-2000, so I'm going to go with 2000 on that one?

 

[Aladin Akyurek]

It needs to be in the second column range, 1000-2000, so I'm going to go with 2000 on that one?

		0	1000	2000	3000	4000
		1000	2000	3000	4000	5000			2	8
0	2	10	7	5	4	0.66			1169	2200
2	4	7	5	4	3	0.88			7	2
4	6	5	4	3	2	1
6	8	4	3	2	2	0.97
8	1.00E+308	0.5	2.4	0.8	3.4	6.2

<COLGROUP><COL style="WIDTH: 48pt" width=64><COL style="WIDTH: 81pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 3840" width=108><COL style="WIDTH: 48pt" span=9 width=64><TBODY>
</TBODY>

J4, copied across:

=INDEX($C$3:$G$7,MATCH(J$2,$A$3:$A$7,1)-(LOOKUP(J$2,$A$3:$A$7) = J$2),
  MATCH(J$3,$C$2:$G$2,1)+(LOOKUP(J$3,$C$2:$G$2) < J$3))

 

[tpuck2687]

That's working great. Now I just have to adjust my table, spreadsheet, and a few cell lookup locations and I should be good. Thanks for your time and effort!!

 

[Aladin Akyurek]

That's working great. Now I just have to adjust my table, spreadsheet, and a few cell lookup locations and I should be good. Thanks for your time and effort!!

You are welcome. And an happy new year.