Hi guys,
if using a normal =LARGE(F1:F85,1) to find the largest value in column F. This is all fine and dandy and works the way it's supposed to.
I need to modify this in such a way though to take into account, the values in column C.
let me explain...
Column C will not always have an entry in the row that has the largest number in Column F.
So I would like the Large command to find the largest entry in Column F but that same row has to have an entry in column C otherwise it's ignored.
so if we have this -
.....C...D...E...F
1....2............4
2..................5
3....1............2
4..................3
5..................1
The largest entry in column F should be 4, because I have an entry in column C.
The second largest entry in column F should be 2 because there's an entry in column C.
I've stumped myself on this one...help!
if using a normal =LARGE(F1:F85,1) to find the largest value in column F. This is all fine and dandy and works the way it's supposed to.
I need to modify this in such a way though to take into account, the values in column C.
let me explain...
Column C will not always have an entry in the row that has the largest number in Column F.
So I would like the Large command to find the largest entry in Column F but that same row has to have an entry in column C otherwise it's ignored.
so if we have this -
.....C...D...E...F
1....2............4
2..................5
3....1............2
4..................3
5..................1
The largest entry in column F should be 4, because I have an entry in column C.
The second largest entry in column F should be 2 because there's an entry in column C.
I've stumped myself on this one...help!