I recently started using the Conditional Sum Wizard in Excel 2000 (the version I use at home) and it appears to be very useful for adding up specific ranges in tables. I am also using Excel 2007 (version I use at the office) where I have the SUMIFS function available.
The two approaches appear to achieve similar good results when creating conditional sum formulas. However the SUMIFS formulas are a little more clear to me conceptually. The nested IF statements generated by the Conditional Sum Wizard can get a little confusing.
Does anyone have thoughts or comments regarding the advantages/drawbacks of using these two approaches? Again they both seem to work, I'm just trying to get feel for which approach I should use more often, especially in Excel 2007 where I have the SUMIFS available and it appears to be a "simpler" approach to conditional summing.
Thank you!
The two approaches appear to achieve similar good results when creating conditional sum formulas. However the SUMIFS formulas are a little more clear to me conceptually. The nested IF statements generated by the Conditional Sum Wizard can get a little confusing.
Does anyone have thoughts or comments regarding the advantages/drawbacks of using these two approaches? Again they both seem to work, I'm just trying to get feel for which approach I should use more often, especially in Excel 2007 where I have the SUMIFS available and it appears to be a "simpler" approach to conditional summing.
Thank you!