Taking the second derivative of the quadratic fit.

steve case

Well-known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
823
My data looks like this:

1992.960 -31.0
1992.985 -33.1
1993.010 -30.9
1993.039 -33.0
1993.064 -35.8
and so on for 900 lines

Time intervals in column "A" are variable and sometimes missing
and column "B" variables wobble up and down mostly up.

I can easily find acceleration using the slope for the first 450 lines
and the second 450 lines with the formula we all learned in 12th
grade physics (v2-v1)/t=a but it doesn't fly if you let on that that's
what was used to come up with nearly the same answer that taking
the 2nd derivative of the quadratic fit finds. I was never a calculus
student so I need a cook-book answer. I've done an internet search
and a Mr. Excel search and I haven't found anything specific or that
I understand that can be plugged into Excel to find "a" by taking the
2nd derivative of the quadratic.

I'm hoping for X values in column "A" and Y values in Column "B"
with formulas in Columns "C" "D" ... etc. copied on down all the lines
that maybe even give me an answer after the first few rows for a value
of "a" for each row from the beginning (-:

I'm not really asking an Excel question it's more like asking for help
with math. So if that's not what Mr. Excel does, my next step is off to
the the local university and a math tutor. I'm prepared to do that.
 
Your most recent post describes how you obtained an acceleration
of 0.084 mm/y^2. ... but I suspect that it is only coincidental


I suspected that as well.

The bottom line here is - there is no way I'm going to go through all
that to try and verify other acceleration claims. I had no doubts that
the CU Sea Level Group got the right answer to the nearly 900 lines
of data. I merely assumed wrongly that it was straight forward and I
wanted a nice Excel solution to taking the second derivative of the
quadratic. Not gonna happen!

Perhaps I should have noticed the statement in the Nerem paper
abstract that said, "we estimate the ... acceleration ...to be..." not
calculated but estimated.
 
Upvote 0

Excel Facts

Using Function Arguments with nested formulas
If writing INDEX in Func. Arguments, type MATCH(. Use the mouse to click inside MATCH in the formula bar. Dialog switches to MATCH.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,215,248
Messages
6,123,869
Members
449,130
Latest member
lolasmith

We've detected that you are using an adblocker.

We have a great community of people providing Excel help here, but the hosting costs are enormous. You can help keep this site running by allowing ads on MrExcel.com.
Allow Ads at MrExcel

Which adblocker are you using?

Disable AdBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Pause on this site" option.
Go back

Disable AdBlock Plus

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock Plus

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the toggle to disable it for "mrexcel.com".
Go back

Disable uBlock Origin

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock Origin

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back

Disable uBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back
Back
Top