Find first instance of a string then "group" all remaining rows together

[john69]

Hello all -

What I want to accomplish is to group the City A's in rows 5 & 6 to 2 & 3 by finding the first instance of a string in the text column and then finding the remaining ones in the rest of the range and moving the entire row(s) up. Once it groups CITY A, then it will search for CITY B, group all of them, then CITY C, etc.
There can be up to several unique text values in a list and up to 600-700 rows of total data.

I hope I have explained it well enough. Thank you in advance for you consideration in helping me with this one!

Before:

ID (col F)	TEXT (col N)
1	CITY A
2	CITY B
3	CITY C
4	CITY A
5	CITY A

<tbody>
</tbody>

After:

ID	TEXT
1	CITY A
4	CITY A
5	CITY A
2	CITY B
3	CITY C

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[gardnertoo]

From the information given, it seems the simplest answer is to select all the data you want arranged this way and sort it by column N.

 

[john69]

From the information given, it seems the simplest answer is to select all the data you want arranged this way and sort it by column N.

Thank you for the reply, but it really isn't that simple. The actual list is for a production line that produces product starting from the west coast and with the exception of grouping the cities together, the first instance of each city must remain where its at and I must move the remaining ones "up" to the first one.
If I just sort by the city, then I lose the "first instance" of each city for production. In a way, it would be like taking a copy of (the first instance) of each unique city name, then inserting the remainder of them just below (along with entire row of data). I apologize I can't explain it any better.

 

[gardnertoo]

...the first instance of each city must remain where its at and I must move the remaining ones "up" to the first one.

Relative to what? Must it remain in a specific row on the sheet (and how will your copy-and-insert affect that?), or do you mean that it must still be where it is relative to the other production from that city?

...If I just sort by the city, then I lose the "first instance" of each city for production...

Not sure what you mean here. You can sort by city first, then by date/time to keep them in chronological order.


A few rows of data, fictionalized to protect your actual data, would probably clear things up. A small set showing what you start with and what you want to end with would be helpful.